Weather, war and protests threaten to rain on Trump’s milit parade

Milit parades have a long history in the United States, both at the national level and in local communities, said Barbara Perry, a presidential historian at the University of Virginia’s Miller Center.

“Humans are drawn to pageantry,” Perry said, but she noted a difference between traditional milit expositions and Trump’s birthday version.

“It’s usually about the personnel,” she said. “Now we know that this president has political issues all around the world, and wanting to show off the might. And if he views it, as in his first term, ‘his generals,’ and, if he views it as ‘his milit,’ then you tie it to your personal special day of your birthday — that’s what’s different.”

Trump critics say he is exploiting the milit to nurture his own ego — at a cost of as much as $45 million to taxpayers — and, as he claims sweeping executive powers, presenting himself in the manner of a dictator. For decades, Americans have associated heavily armed milit parades with Cold War-era authoritarianism in the former Soviet Union and other countries.

Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., also made that comparison this week and said he didn’t think the parade was the best idea.

“I wouldn’t have done it,” Paul said Tuesday. “The images you saw in the Soviet Union and North Korea, we were proud not to be that.”

That may help explain why most American adults are sour on the idea. New NBC News Decision Desk polling, released Saturday morning, shows that 64% of adults surveyed say they disapprove of the parade. Protests are planned in Washington and across the country, organized under the slogan “No kings.”

Trump, who promised to meet protesters with “very big force,” has sought to rebut the notion that he is celebrating himself.

“It will be a parade like we haven’t had in many, many decades here,” he said this week. “And it’s a celebration of our country. It’s a celebration of the Army, actually.”

Democratic lawmakers pushed back on Trump and Defense Secret Pete Hegseth, who was on Capitol Hill for a round of hearings this week, over their choices in how to use the milit.

“You are deploying the American milit to police the American people. Sending the National Guard into California without the governor’s request. Sending the Marines — not after foreign threats, but after American protesters,” Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., the top Democrat on the Appropriations Committee, told Hegseth.

“And now President Trump is promising heavy force against peaceful protesters at his D.C. milit parade,” she said. “Those sorts of actions, and that sort of rhetoric from the president, should stop every one of us cold. Threatening to use our own troops — on our own citizens — at such scale is unprecedented, it is unconstitutional, and it is downright un-American.”

Ken Carodine, a retired Navy rear admiral, said in a telephone interview with NBC News that the parade is not just “a terrible idea” but one that many of the servicemembers may not be excited about.

“Most of the guys that are involved in either organizing or participating in this thing, it’s the last thing they want to be doing. But they can’t say anything,” he said, explaining that they must follow the orders of their superiors, right up to the commander in chief.

“It’s a stupid order,” Carodine said. “But it’s a legal order.”

Some Republican lawmakers, including those who routinely back the president’s actions, said this week that they are not enamored of the idea of the display.

“The United States of America is the most powerful country in all of human history,” Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., said Tuesday. “We’re a lion, and a lion doesn’t have to tell you it’s a lion. Everybody else in the jungle knows. And we’re a lion.”

Federal officials held discussions Friday afternoon about whether to move the start of the parade, scheduled for 6:30 p.m. after a day of festivities around the National Mall, to try to avoid the dangers and discomfort of possible thunderstorms. They ultimately decided to move ahead as planned.